Legal Opinion

Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Fraley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 18, 1986No. 17619; CA A34868PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Plaintiffs successfully sought damages and injunctive relief for defendant’s breach of an insurance agency contract and for the post-termination breach of a noncompetition covenant. Defendant’s first 11 assignments of error fail, because Paragraph G of the contract is unambiguous. See Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Chamberlain, 77 Or App 245, 250, 712 P2d 172, rev den 300 Or 563 (1986). The remaining assignment of error is that the trial court erred in concluding that the noncompetition covenant was valid as a reasonable restraint of trade. We affirm.

The covenant provides, in part:

“For payment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. ELDRIDGE v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. North Pacific Lumber Co. v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Cascade Exchange, Inc. v. ReedOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. ChamberlainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hapney v. Central Garage, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Nike, Inc. v. Eugene McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Chapman & Drake v. HarringtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  4. Dymock v. Norwest Safety Protective Equipment for Oregon Industry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API