Legal Opinion

Ober v. . Katzenstein

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1912Published

Appeal by plaintiff from Cline, J., at February Term, 1911, of WARREN. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Chief Justice Ciarle.

1Opinion

The plaintiff appealed because the defendant was allowed to show in evidence that under his contract with the plaintiff he had sold to his customers 88 tons of fertilizers at a profit of $2.25 per ton, which the plaintiff had failed to ship; and also to show that he had prepared two plant-beds at a cost of $60, and was unable to use them for that purpose because of failure to receive the guano; and, thirdly, because the defendant was permitted to show that the higher priced labor which he had retained for use on the tobacco farm up to the time he had to discharge them on account of failure to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tomlinson & Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Huffman v. Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Outlaw v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Charles M. Pfeifer & Co. v. IsraelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API