Legal Opinion

People v. Phipps

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 27, 1979No. 15546PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE MILLS

delivered the opinion of the court:

Can the State appeal an order directing the disclosure of personal files and information about some of the prosecution’s witnesses prior to a trial on the merits?

No.

The trial court held that any witness who invoked his privilege of confidentiality under the mental health statute was barred from testifying in this prosecution.

This is not ripe for appeal. Why not? Let us see.

Defendant was charged with cruelty to persons (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 23, par. 2368), maltreatment of a mentally retarded person (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. The People v. LoveIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People Ex Rel. Stamos v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  4. People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. Van De RostyneIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Almgren v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. FlattIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. PhippsIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People Ex Rel. Edgar v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API