Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Eakman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BLOSSER, .J.

Numerous objections and exceptions were taken to the admission and rejection of testimony and a number of doubtful and difficult questions appear in the record, but in view of the fact that George Oden Davis, an essential and necessary party was omitted in the court below, we do not deem it would serve any useful purpose for us to review those questions at this time as they may not arise in a future trial of the case when all necessary and essential parties are before the court.

After the case was argued and submitted to this court in this error proceeding the plaintiff in error…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Campbell v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API