Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cheatham v. Franke

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 9, 1957No. 10440Published

1DissentHughes, Justice

I respectfully dissent. I do so because in my opinion there was only one judgment which the Trial Court could have rendered *208under this record, the judgment he did render — a judgment for appellees. If this is correct then intermediate errors are of no consequence. 3-B Tex.Jur. Sec. 875.

‘ In my opinion'appellant .failed to prove a cause of action in that she failed to prove that appellees were legally responsible for the advice given by Mr. Weatherred regarding the will of Dr. Cheatham, or at any rate that they were any more legally responsible for such advice than was appellant.

Appellant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. San Antonio Bar Ass'n v. Guardian Abstract & Title Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Stringfellow v. EarlyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  3. Wade v. WadeTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Dickerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Robbins v. Simmons' EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API