Legal Opinion
Smith v. Sex Offender Registry Board
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided March 24, 2006No. 04-P-969PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMills, J.
A Superior Court judge, on the plaintiff’s appeal pursuant to G. L. c. 30A, § 14, and G. L. c. 6, § 178M, affirmed the final decision of the sex offender registry board *804(board), to classify him as a level one (low risk) sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Act, G. L. c. 6, §§ 178C-178P (act), and 803 Code Mass. Regs. §§ 1.01 et seq. (2002). In this appeal the plaintiff argues that the judge incorrectly affirmed the board’s classification because (1) the board had abused its discretion in analyzing the record where there was insufficient evidence to meet…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McKune v. LileSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Wynn & Wynn, P.C. v. Massachusetts Commission against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Albert v. Municipal Court of the City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Massachusetts Federation of Teachers v. Board of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- DutilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 68549 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. MazzarinoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- Loe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.