Legal Opinion
Exquisito Services, Inc. v. Bartenders, Motel, Hotel & Restaurant Workers Local Union No. 222
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 1, 1984No. C-3-83-742PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEPENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES OVERRULED; PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD OVERRULED; TERMINATION ENTRY
RICE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Exquisito Services, Inc., brought suit to vacate an arbitration award rendered in favor of an employee represented by Defendant Bartenders, Motel, Hotel and Restaurant Workers Union No. 222 (Union). Defendant has moved for summary judgment, contending that this Court should not disturb the arbitrator’s decision, and for an award of attorney’s fees. For the following…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Detroit Coil Company v. International Association of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, Lodge 82Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Benjamin F. Shaw Co. v. Cincinnati Gas & ElectricDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
- Premium Building Products Co. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1985
- Re/Max International, Inc. v. ZamesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
- Exquisito Services, Inc. v. Bartenders, Motel, Hotel and Restaurant Workers, Local Union 222Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Victor Tate v. Fischer Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986