Legal Opinion

Croll v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1980No. Appeals, Nos. 1456 and 1458 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson, Jr.,

Henry Croll (claimant) had been a drill press and lathe operator from 1956 until 1975 at a plant operated by Dorr-Oliver, Inc. (employer), a manufacturer of filtration equipment. On September 8, 1977, the claimant applied for workmen’s compensation benefits for total and permanent disability as a result of silicosis, as provided for by Section 108 (k) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, added by Section 1 of the Act of October 17, 1972, P.L. 930, as amended, 77 P.S. §27.1 (k). He alleged that he had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Neville Cement Products Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Croll v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Croll v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API