Legal Opinion

William Hames v. City of Miami

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 20, 2008No. 07-11821UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

After oral argument and careful consideration, the judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed. With one exception, we agree with the district court that plaintiffs due process challenge to the state appellate procedures is not ripe. The one exception has to do with the fact that the Third District Court of Appeals has considered and has rejected plaintiffs appeal of the forfeiture decision issued with respect to the Trust. Plaintiff argues in this Court that the state review procedures are unconstitutionally deficient in that the state standard of review would be a miscarriage of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hames v. CITY OF MIAMI FIREFIGHTERS'District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  2. Newmans v. State, Div. of RetirementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garay v. Department of Management Services, Division of RetirementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. Sammie Todd Moser v. The Virginia Retirement SystemDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2025
  3. Vicki Baumgartner, Personal Representative Of The Estate of Richard R. Baumgartner v. Tennessee Consolidated Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API