Pierce v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
COLLEY, Justice.
Louis Arthur Pierce was convicted by a jury of aggravated sexual assault of a male child.1 The jury assessed punishment at eighty years’ confinement. We affirm.
Pierce presents five points of error. First, he argues the court erred in refusing *316to discharge him and dismiss the indictment under the Speedy Trial Act.2 Second, Pierce contends the trial court erred in failing to suppress the victim’s in-court identification of him and the pretrial identification made by the victim from a six-picture photographic spread. Third, he claims the indictment is fundamentally defective. By…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Littles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Brewster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Hardinge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Lyles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ladner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1993
- Ieppert, Steven Louis v. Texas, the State Of, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
- James Massey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- in the Matter of C.D.G., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
- in the Matter of C.D.G., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.