Arthur J. Zeizel v. Samuel R. Pierce, Secretary, Department of Housing & Urban Development
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge:
The District Court for the District of Columbia denied appellant Zeizel’s application, under both the Back Pay Act 1 and the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 2 , for attorney fees incurred in his successful challenge of a 1974 denial of a within-grade pay increase. We affirm the district court because neither the Back Pay Act as it existed before the effective date of the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA) nor the EAJA permit the award of attorney fees in this instance.
I
Arthur J. Zeizel, an Environmental Scientist, GS-15, with the Technology and Environmental Research…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lukas E. Hoska, III v. United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Crowley v. ShultzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- D'ANGELO v. Department of the NavyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States of America v. Christopher PaddackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio, Local 3882 v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Intervenor. United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio, Local 3882, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- American Federation of Government Employees v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- United States of America v. Christopher PaddackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987