State v. Lohmeier
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentJanine P. Geske, J.
I dissent because I believe that there is a reasonable likelihood that the contributory negligence instruction, in combination with Wis JI — Criminal 1185 and 1186, misled the jury into believing it could not consider the young women's conduct in regard to Lohmeier's statutory affirmative defense. I would affirm the court of appeals and hold that there is a reasonable likelihood that the contributory negligence instruction misled the jury, for several reasons.
First, the defense essentially conceded these elements of the charges under Wis. Stat. § 940.09(l)(a) and Wis. Stat. § 940.09(l)(b):…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hart v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. SchulzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Boldt v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- State v. LohmeierCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995