Legal Opinion
Furst v. Adler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 25, 1915Published
1Opinion of the Court
Action by Charles S. Furst against A. Sanford Adler, impleaded with others. F. Bien, of New York City, for appellant. H. Wollman, of New York City, for .respondents. .No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and. disbursements, on the authority of Tanzer v. Breen, 131 App. Div. 654, 116 N. Y. Supp. 110. Order filed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tanzer v. BreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909