Richardson Bros. v. Petersen
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Scott District Court. Action to enforce, by attachment, a landlord’s lien. The cause was tried without a jury, and judgment rendered for plaintiffs. The intervenor appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
At a former term of this court, an opinibn was filed in this case, reversing the judgment of the court below. Upon a petition for rehearing, the cause was again argued. Upon the second argument, we have reached the conclusion that the judgment of the District Court ought to be affirmed.
II. The action was brought to enforce the landlord’s lien of plaintiffs, and upon the attachment, two horses were seized. Petersen, the tenant, is defendant in the action, and Eurz intervens, claiming to own the horses seized under the attachment. The case was tried upon the following agreed statements of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nesbitt v. BartlettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ginsberg v. LindelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Mitchell v. Monarch Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- Sioux Valley State Bank v. HonnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Beck v. Minnesota & Western Grain Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Blake v. CounselmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.