Legal Opinion
Vandenheuvel v. Wagner
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 16, 2004No. A03-324Published
1Opinion of the Court
673 N.W.2d 524 (2004)
D. Scott VANDENHEUVEL, et al., Appellants,
v.
Virgil A. WAGNER, Respondent.
No. A03-324.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
January 16, 2004.
Robert J. Leighton, Jr., Nolan, MacGregor, Thompson & Leighton, St. Paul, MN, for appellants.
Steven R. Schwegman, Mary B. Mahler, Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A., St. Cloud, MN, for respondent.
Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, Presiding Judge; WILLIS, Judge; and G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
Appellants, D. Scott and Dawn Vandenheuvel, challenge the district court's award to respondent of all of respondent's costs and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- House v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Collins v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Green Giant Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Nguyen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Borchert v. MaloneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.