Legal Opinion

De Van Motor Co. v. Bailey

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1936No. 32421PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGowen, J.

In a justice of the peace court, the appellee, R. G. Bailey, instituted a proceeding to enforce a mechanic and materialman’s lien on a certain motortruck, for repairs done, and materials furnished in the repair of said truck, at the instance of Murray Byrd, amounting to fifty-three dollars and forty-six cents. A writ of seizure was executed and levied upon the truck in question, and W. M. Byrd was summoned as a defendant. Upon the seizure of the truck by the officer, the De Van Motor Company claimed it, executed a forthcoming bond, and filed its affidavit claiming to be the owner in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. J. A. Broom & Son v. S. S. Dale & SonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hollis & Ray v. IsbellMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Moorhead Motor Co. v. H. D. Walker Auto Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Orr v. Jackson Jitney Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Harrison v. Broadway Motor Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allstate Ins. Co. v. GreenMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Thorp Commercial Corp. v. MISS. ROAD SUPPLYMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Funchess v. PenningtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Maulhardt v. JD Coggins CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Huntley v. DrummondMississippi Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API