Legal Opinion

Wallace & Tiernan Products, Inc. v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1944No. Civil Action No. 3063PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

Wallace & Tiernan Products, Inc., has-filed its complaint wherein it prays a judgment of this court directing the Commissioner of Patents to issue a patent to-it as assignee of one Franz C. Schmellces. The complaint cites, as conferring jurisdiction upon the court, the provisions of' *640Section 4915, R.S., as amended, U.S.C.A. Title 35, § 63, which reads in part as follows :

“Sec. 4915. (U.S.C.A. title 35, § 63). Whenever a patent on application is refused by the Board of Appeals or whenever any applicant is dissatisfied with the decision of the Board of interference…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wettlaufer v. RobinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  2. Potter v. MayoSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Van CleefCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  4. Galena Manufacturing Co. of Illinois v. Superior Oil WorksCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Etten v. Lovell Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API