Legal Opinion
Rdsor v. Knox Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2006-Ca-38 (12-19-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 19, 2007No. 2006-CA-38PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} RDSOR appeals a judgment of the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals which accepted the valuation of RDSOR's property, made by the Knox County Board of Revision for tax purposes. RDSOR assigns two errors to the Board:
{¶ 2} "I. THE OHIO BOARD OF TAX APPEALS ERRED WHEN IT FAILED TO ADOPT THE VALUE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS ESTABLISHED BY THE KNOX COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ON JUNE 12, 2003.
{¶ 3} "II. THE OHIO BOARD OF TAX APPEALS ERRED IN THAT THEIR (sic) DECISION TO ADOPT THE AUDITOR'S [VALUE] IS AGAINST THE MANIFEST WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE."
{¶ 4} The property at issue consists of a 5,808…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State ex rel. Smith v. O'ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Cleveland Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Board of Education v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rdsor v. Knox County Auditor, 08-Ca-23 (5-13-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009