Legal Opinion

United States v. Cortez

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 18, 2001No. Nos. 01-2077, 01-2078Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

2Per curiam

After examining the briefs and the record provided in Appellant’s Appendix, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App.P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir.R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted o without oral argument.

Defendant-appellant Lawrence Robert Cortez appeals the district court’s denial of release pending trial. Exercising our jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3145(c), we reverse and remand for further findings consistent with this order and judgment.

*710FA…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Grant C. Affleck, United States of America v. Frank Kowalik, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Jack Moody Stricklin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Deborah K. TroxellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Robert Douglas CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Breck M. SwanquistCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API