Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Conway

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided July 7, 2009No. 08-CV-6582LPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Herbert Burgess, appearing pro se, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”), has sued several DOCS employees and other defendants, alleging that defendants violated plaintiffs constitutional rights in certain respects in 2008, while plaintiff was confined at Attica Correctional Facility.

Defendants have moved to revoke plaintiffs informa pauperis (“IFP”) status and to dismiss the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. John Ruddin Brown v. Lisa JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Pointer v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Malik v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. Thompson v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  5. Polanco v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bonano v. SheahanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
  2. Bradshaw v. AnnucciDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
  3. Bradshaw v. The City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
  4. Bradshaw v. UhlerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2022
  5. Bradshaw v. UhlerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API