Legal Opinion

United States v. Austin

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided May 20, 1982No. ACM 23374PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

MAHONEY, Judge:

The accused pled guilty to wrongfully using and transferring drug abuse paraphernalia in violation of paragraph 3-5, Air Force Regulation 30-2, Social Actions Program, dated 22 June 1981, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 892. Paragraph 3-3c(12) of AFR 30-2 defines drug abuse paraphernalia as:

Any equipment, product, or material that is used, intended to be used, or designed to be used, in planting, propagating, cultivating, growing, harvesting, manufacturing, compounding, converting, producing, processing, preparing, testing,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. FortneyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  2. United States v. FosterU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HancockU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  2. United States v. BradleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  3. United States v. BatchelorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. HesterU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API