Legal Opinion

State v. WB

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 27, 2011No. A-80 September Term 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

17 A.3d 187 (2011)

205 N.J. 588

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

W.B., Defendant-Appellant.

A-80 September Term 2009.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 13, 2010.

Decided April 27, 2011.

Steven J. Kaflowitz, South Orange, argued the cause for appellant (Timothy R. Smith & Associates, attorneys).

Steven E. Braun, Chief Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Camelia M. Valdes, Passaic County Prosecutor, attorney).

Deborah C. Bartolomey, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General of New Jersey (Paula T. Dow, Attorney General, attorney).

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API