Tims v. . Potter
Superior Court of North Carolina
1Opinion
The person who has the remainder surely has the jus proprietatis; the person who has the absolute property must have the increase; if the special proprietor could claim it, it must occasion infinite disputes.
The increase cannot be separated from the absolute property. It is a case peculiar to this country. We must have recourse to general principles of justice and policy; and the authority of generally received opinions ought to have great weight, supported by long adoption in cases of property.
NOTE. — The question decided in this case, that the increase of slaves limited to one for life with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Goodloe v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1825
- Graham v. Graham's AdministratorsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1823
- Morrow v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1831
- Covington v. . McEntireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1842
- Glasgow v. . FlowersSuperior Court of North Carolina · 1795
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.