Legal Opinion

Tims v. . Potter

Superior Court of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 1789Published

1Opinion

The person who has the remainder surely has the jus proprietatis; the person who has the absolute property must have the increase; if the special proprietor could claim it, it must occasion infinite disputes.

The increase cannot be separated from the absolute property. It is a case peculiar to this country. We must have recourse to general principles of justice and policy; and the authority of generally received opinions ought to have great weight, supported by long adoption in cases of property.

NOTE. — The question decided in this case, that the increase of slaves limited to one for life with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goodloe v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1825
  2. Graham v. Graham's AdministratorsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1823
  3. Morrow v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1831
  4. Covington v. . McEntireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1842
  5. Glasgow v. . FlowersSuperior Court of North Carolina · 1795

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API