Legal Opinion

Glaser v. M. Fortunoff of Westbury Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1988PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Titone, J.

A tort-feasor’s claim for reimbursement against a succes*645sive, independent tort-feasor whose negligence aggravated the injured plaintiffs damages is one in the nature of contribution, not indemnification. Consequently, General Obligations Law § 15-108 (c), which governs the effect of settlement on contribution but not indemnification causes of action, operates to bar the assertion of such claims by a tort-feasor who has settled with the injured plaintiff.

On November 18, 1982, plaintiff Carol Glaser fell and fractured her knee while she was in the Long Island store…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Riviello v. WaldronNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Hill v. St. Clare's HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. McDermott v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Rogers v. Dorchester AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Mas v. Two Bridges AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Giglio v. NTIMP Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Camofi Master LDC v. College Partnership, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. BlankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API