Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. United States

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 22, 1941No. Civil No. 520Published

1DissentMcCOLLOCH, District Judge

Even though it be true, as contended by counsel, that the modern decisions grant the unreviewable right to the Interstate Commerce Commission to interpret and apply the Motor Carrier Act to concrete situations, it does not follow that the Commission may exercise such power, judicial in nature, in a distinctly unjudicial manner. The statute gives “grandfather rights” to an applicant “if any such carrier or predecessor in interest was in bona fide operation as a common carrier by motor vehicle on June 1, 1935, * * * and has so operated since that time”. More than five years after the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. MaherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Maher v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API