Legal Opinion

Friede v. Weissenthanner

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 15, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of the General Term of the City Court, reversing an order of the Special Term, of the City Court, denying respondent’s motion to vacate an attachment.

1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.

On the 26th day of December, 1895, this action was begun by the issuance of a warrant, of attachment against the property of the defendant, a nonresident. Ho proceedings were taken to dissolve the warrant until after the trial of the cause on the 11th day of Hovémber, 1898, which resulted in an 'affirmative judgment for the defendant on a counterclaim. Then the defendant moved on the. judgment-roll, affidavits and the papers on which the warrant had been granted to have it vacated and set aside. This application was opposed on counter affidavits. The denial of the motion at the Special Term…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henry v. SalisburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Corn Exchange Bank v. BossioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Milliken v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Youngman v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Flick v. Wyoming Valley Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API