Legal Opinion

Westerdale v. Grossman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 3, 2000No. 3 — 99 — 0619PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin

Plaintiff Wallace Westerdale sought to partition his life estate from those interests held by his sisters, defendants Sarah Grace Tolliver and Ruth Carolyn Grossman (collectively, the sisters). The trial court agreed with Ruth’s contention that the contingent nature of the remainder interest in Wallace’s life estate prevented the partitioning of the land and granted her motion to dismiss. We reverse and hold that a tenant in common, as the holder of a life estate, has an absolute right to force a partition between himself and his co-tenants even when the petitioner’s remainder in his life…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Peck v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Heldt v. HeldtIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Whittaker v. PorterIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. In Re Marriage of ClearmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Wells v. DaliesIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Geneva Anhx IV LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2013
  2. Colorado Korean Ass'n v. KOREAN SEN. ASS'N.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Poruba v. PorubaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. Poruba v. PorubaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API