Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth ex rel. Matthews v. Combs

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 29, 1968Published

1DissentMontgomery, Judge

I respectfully dissent because I do not feel that the law should be circumvented by the obvious device used here. The purpose of KRS 160.180(4) is to prevent the nepotism which was practiced here. Hall v. Boyd County Board of Education, 265 Ky. 500, 97 S.W.2d 38. The salutary purpose of the statute is discussed in Letcher v. Commonwealth ex rel. Matthews, Ky., 414 S.W.2d 402, and the cases cited therein. In Letcher and in its companion case, Commonwealth ex rel. Matthews v. Coatney, Ky., 396 S.W. 2d 72, three county school board members were ousted for violations of the statute. *464The conflict…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Letcher v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  2. Hall v. Boyd County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  3. Commonwealth v. CoatneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API