Legal Opinion

Twin City Fire Ins. v. Colonial Life Ins.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 21, 2002No. 1001831PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case stems from a dispute over the manner in which one insurance company represented another insurance company in an underlying action alleging the wrongful termination of an employee. It comes to this Court via two certified questions from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. Our answer to the first question moots the second question.

I. Factual Background

Twin City Fire Insurance Company ("Twin City") provided commercial general liability ("CGL") coverage to Colonial Life Accident Insurance Company ("Colonial") from 1994-1996. One of Colonial's former…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Weber v. BiddleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  3. L & S Roofing Supply Co. v. ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCESupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. AENTA CAS. & SUR. CO. v. Mitchell Bros. Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Lifestar Response of Alabama, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  3. Pharmacia Corp. v. SuggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Southern Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  5. State Farm & Casualty Co. v. MyrickDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API