Legal Opinion

Bolden v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 19, 2009No. 1D08-1706PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant challenges his conviction and sentence for armed burglary. We find no error as to the conviction but determine, as correctly conceded by the State, that there was insufficient evidence establishing that appellant was in actual possession of a firearm during the burglary. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and life sentence but strike the mandatory minimum portion of the sentence and remand for the trial court to correct the sentence. Appellant need not be present when the trial court makes the necessary correction. Williams v. State, 997 So.2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

WOLF, BENTON,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API