Legal Opinion
Camera v. Target Corporation
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 8, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00095Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT VINCENT CAMERA, 3:18-cv-00095 (KAD) Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORPORATION, June 8, 2020 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 42) Kari A. Dooley, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Vincent Camera (“Mr. Camera,” or the “Plaintiff”) filed this action against Target Corporation (“Target,” or the “Defendant”) alleging that he sustained serious injuries from a fall in a Target store in North Haven, CT, which the Plaintiff alleges was due to Target’s negligence in, inter alia, failing to maintain…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hicks v. BainesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Wright v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Edward E. Lucente, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Jeffreys v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.