Legal Opinion

Tormey v. LaGuardia

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGoldrick, J.

The three petitioners hold the positions of inspector of regulating, grading and paving, grade 3, bureau of engineering, in the office of the president of the borough of Richmond. On May 1, 1934, they were laid off for lack of funds. Then they were receiving these salaries: one (Tormey) $2,640 per annum; the other two (Herault and Dougherty) each $2,415 per annum. On August 8, 1934, they were reinstated to the same positions as per diem employees at eight dollars per day, with an appropriation sufficient to pay an average of only $2,000 per man in any one year or enough to pay each man for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Mooney v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Matter of Rushford v. LaguardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Dixon v. LaguardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Matter of Tormey v. LaguardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Matter of Finegan v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tormey v. LaGuardiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Cannizzaro v. JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. Trinity Syndicate Corp. v. Department of FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Hart v. County of ChautauquaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API