Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. Bridges
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 23, 2005No. A05A1274PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.
Pursuant to our grant of its application for discretionary appeal, Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) appeals from the superior court’s order affirming the appellate division’s affirmance of administrative law judge (ALJ) Badcock-Hagler’s ruling that MARTA had improperly reduced and then stopped the temporary total disability payments of employee Hoyle Bridges.
In reviewing a workers’ compensation award, both this court and the superior court must construe the evidence in the light most favorable to the party prevailing before the appellate division.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mayor and Aldermen of Savannah v. StevensSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Aldrich v. City of Lumber CitySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Coker v. Deep South Surplus of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Russell Morgan Landscape Management v. Velez-OchoaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- City of Atlanta v. SumlinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reid v. Georgia Building AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Cypress Insurance v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Lingo v. Early County Gin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- In re: N.N.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.