Roberts v. Ferguson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
The bill is for the foreclosure of a mortgage on real estate and deficiency decree over against defendants S. S. and Mary Roberts.
As to the foreclosure feature, the sufficiency of the bill is clear and is not challenged by any assignments of demurrer. Stuckey v. Murphy, post, p. 700, 145 So. 914; Rountree v. Satterfield, 211 Ala. 464, 100 So. 751.
The demurrers separately interposed by S. S. Roberts and Mary Roberts are properly to be construed under the cases of National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Lasseter, 224 Ala. 649, 141 So. 645, 646, Wood v. Estes, 224 Ala. 140, 139 So. 331,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oden v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Wood v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. LassetterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Rountree v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Hall v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. De JernettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Hale v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Pratt City Sav. Bank v. Merchants' Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Dudley v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Whatley v. WhatleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.