Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Frank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 28, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The recovery in a wrongful death action must be distributed to the widow and next of kin “ in proportion to the pecuniary injuries suffered ” by each (Decedent Estate Law, § 133). By the order appealed from the Acting Surrogate directed a distribution simply according to life expectancy, so that the widow received 18% and her two sons received 82% of the recovery. Nothing in the record warrants a finding that their loss so exceeded hers. The sons are grown and employed. The evidence establishing the assistance which the deceased rendered to them is sparse and unsatisfactory. The widow’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sider v. . General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Gross v. AbrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Meng v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re AcquafreddaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re the Estate of GiambertoneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
  3. In re the Estate of SignsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API