Legal Opinion

United States v. Saul Haro-Salcedo

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 19, 1997No. 96-4053PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Saul Haro-Salcedo entered a plea of guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), conditioned on appeal of the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized at the time of his arrest. On appeal, Mr. Haro-Salcedo argues that im-poundment of his vehicle was not authorized by Utah law; that the subsequent search of his vehicle exceeded the permissible scope of an inventory search; and that consequently, the seized evidence was not admissible under the inevitable discovery doctrine. We…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. United States v. Claudio Lugo, AKA Lugo Mano, Joel Logue-Lugo, Joel Lugo LukeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States of America, -Appellee v. Larry SouzaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Victor Manuel Torres-CastroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Belki Maria Vasquez De ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API