United States v. Saul Haro-Salcedo
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Saul Haro-Salcedo entered a plea of guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), conditioned on appeal of the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized at the time of his arrest. On appeal, Mr. Haro-Salcedo argues that im-poundment of his vehicle was not authorized by Utah law; that the subsequent search of his vehicle exceeded the permissible scope of an inventory search; and that consequently, the seized evidence was not admissible under the inevitable discovery doctrine. We…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- United States v. Claudio Lugo, AKA Lugo Mano, Joel Logue-Lugo, Joel Lugo LukeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States of America, -Appellee v. Larry SouzaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Victor Manuel Torres-CastroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Belki Maria Vasquez De ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.