In Re the Appeal From the Approval of the Application of Wake Kidney Clinic, P.A.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
The two main issues raised by petitioners on this appeal are whether DHR erred in considering evidence petitioners contend constituted an improper amendment to the application and whether the criteria necessary to DHR’s decision were supported by substantial evidence. We conclude that the challenged evidence was properly before DHR and that the decision has substantial support in the record. Therefore, we affirm the decision to grant the certificate of need to Wake Kidney Clinic, P.A.
Wake Kidney Clinic, P.A., submitted its application for a certificate of need on 15 November…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Humana Hosp. Corp. Inc. v. Dept. of Human Resources, Div. of Facility ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Hospital Group of Western North Carolina, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
3Cited by9 opinions
- Britthaven, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Dialysis Care of North Carolina, LLC v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Living Centers-Southeast, Inc. v. N.C. Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Presbyterian-Orthopaedic Hospital v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- In re Conditional Approval of Certificate of Need Application of Health Care & Retirement Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.