Legal Opinion
Hoyt v. County of Broome
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDeyo, J.
This motion is urged primarily on the ground that subdivision 1 of section 245 of the Military Law violates sections 1 and 2 of article VIII of the Constitution of the State of New York in so far as it requires a political subdivision of the State, in this instance, Broome county, to pay a salary to the plaintiff, an employee of the county, during his absence from his duties while engaged in the performance of Federal military duty.
On May 1, 1937, the plaintiff was appointed an investigator in the department of public welfare at a monthly salary of $93.33. On June 26, 1938, he was duly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Town of Guilford v. . the Supervisors of Chenango CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Matter Appl'n Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
- People v. Westchester County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Matter of Barthelmess v. . CukorNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hoyt v. County of BroomeNew York Court of Appeals · 1941