Legal Opinion

Auler v. Van Natta

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1997No. 29A02-9703-CV-191PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge.

In this medical malpractice action for the implantation of a saline breast implant without the patient’s consent, Nora Auler and husband Paul Auler appeal the summary judgment in favor of Humana Womens Hospital, now Women’s Hospital-Indianapolis (the Hospital). The issue presented is whether the Hospital had or assumed a duty to secure the patient’s informed consent for the implantation.

We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The facts construed in favor of the Aulers show that Nora, suffering cancer of the left breast, was admitted to the Hospital for removal of the breast…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Webb v. JarvisIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Scott v. Bodor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Gariup Const. Co., Inc. v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Public Health Trust of Dade Cty. v. ValcinSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  5. Goldsberry v. GrubbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McSwane v. Bloomington Hospital & Healthcare SystemIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Mullins v. Parkview Hospital, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Ward v. First Indiana Plaza Joint VentureIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Bowman v. BeghinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Kostidis v. GENERAL CINEMA CORP., OF INDIANAIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API