Legal Opinion

Sickels v. Packard Motor Car Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1933No. Docket No. 11, Calendar No. 37,069PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Plaintiff, Ernest Sickels, claims compensation for an injury lie received on July 15,1927, while working in the wood-working department of defendant, the Packard Motor Car Company. A fragment of steel, loosened when a hammer contacted with a steel cutter, struck plaintiff in the right eye and caused him considerable pain. He immediately repaired to defendant’s hospital for treatment by the head nurse, who made a written record of the accident. She provided him with some medication to apply to the eye, and, with the assistance of his wife and fellow employees, he followed -the prescribed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shafer v. Parke, Davis & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. White v. Morgan & WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hayes v. BoutellMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Starkweather v. Weidman Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Schneyder v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API