Legal Opinion
State v. Santiago
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 29, 1998No. 96-2818PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
We reverse an order dismissing the charges against Appellee on the grounds that section 322.34(l)(a), Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional. The issue here is the same as that recently resolved in State v. Keirn, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D1144, — So.2d-(Fla. 4th DCA May 6, 1998), in which we concluded that said statute is constitutional.
We remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Keim.
STONE, C.J., and KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Raulerson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Hoskins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998