Legal Opinion

Dedeke v. Rural Water District No. 5

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 28, 1981No. 51,281PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Prager, J.:

This is a dispute between a farm couple and a rural water district which arose when employees of the water district cut off the plaintiffs’ water service. The plaintiffs, Walter E. Dedeke and his wife, Iva June Dedeke, are owners of farmland in Leavenworth County and participating members of the water district. The defendants are Rural Water District No. 5, Leavenworth County, and the chairman of its board of directors, Edward Bott. The water supplying plaintiffs’ farm was cut d ff at the meter, when the defendants concluded the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Leek v. TheisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  4. Geraldine Sterling v. Village of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  5. Stanford v. Gas Service CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Hinds CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Rural Water District No. 1, Ellsworth County, Kansas v. City Of Wilson, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. In Re Petition of City of MoranSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. Rural Water Dist. No. 4 v. City of Eudora, Kan.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. In re S.M.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API