Capital Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, City and Chamber of Commerce of Toledo, Ohio, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Circuit Judge.
This case raises a new and important question in the administration of the Federal Aviation Act. It is the first proceeding in which the Civil Aeronautics Board has found a certified carrier’s service to be inadequate and has ordered it to provide additional flights. 1
The City and Chamber of Commerce of Toledo, Ohio, filed a joint complaint before the Board alleging that Capital Airlines (“Capital”) was .not rendering Toledo adequate service to and from New York, Chicago, Philadelphia and Cleveland, as required by § 404(a) of the Act. 2 The Board ordered an…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
3Cited by10 opinions
- Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., Intervenors. Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Air Transport Association of America, Transamerica Airlines, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Television Corporation of Michigan, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Wood Broadcasting, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Diefenthal v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.