Vanderford v. Foreman.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActiON by T. H. Vanderford and others against J. Q. and I). F. Foreman, trading as Foreman Bros., heard by Judge 'Geo. IT. Broten and a jury, at May Term, 1903, of the Superior Court of RowaN County. From a judgment for tbe plaintiffs, tbe defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The tender, in writing, made by tbe defendant and accepted by tbe plaintiff, and in which there was an offer made to pay a certain amount, less than that mentioned in tbe complaint, in full of rent claimed and the costs, contained tbe following words in its conclusion, “And ask and demand that tbe same be accepted and this action and proceeding cease and be dismissed under said sec. 1 *173 of Tbe Code.” Upon tbe further prosecution of tbe case by tbe plaintiff, his Honor, upon tbe motion of tbe defendant, made, both at tbe call of the case and at tbe end of the evidence, refused to dismiss the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Mauney v. . NorvellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Product Company v. Dunn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Elm & Greene Streets Realty Co. v. DemetrelisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Seligson v. . KlymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.