Legal Opinion
Dafler v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 15, 1993PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Per curiam
We granted certification, 130 N.J. 601, 617 A. 2d 1223 (1992), to review so much of the judgment of the Appellate Division as determined that the trial record contained sufficient evidence to permit the jury to apportion damages between asbestos exposure and cigarette smoking. See Dafler v. Raymark Industries, Inc., 259 N.J.Super. 17, 35-36, 611 A.2d 136 (1992).
We affirm the judgment on the foregoing issue, substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge King's opinion for the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dafler v. Raymark Industries, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Miller v. Passaic Valley Water CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
3Cited by22 opinions
- Fiore v. Consolidated FreightwaysSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Zarow-Smith v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Theer v. Philip Carey Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Goss v. American Cyanamid Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Steven v. Sauer v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.