Legal Opinion

The John J. Feeney

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 10, 1933No. 12966PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALSTON, District Judge.

The libel alleges that barges John J. Feeney and Louise Schumann, while proceeding in the New York State Barge Canal between locks 33 and 32, in tow of the tug Cornell No. 20 bound from Buffalo to New York, sustained damage.

It is alleged that the tug Thomas R. Coyne was seen proceeding west with four barges in tow; that the Cornell No. 20 thereupon went over to the starboard side of the canal and slackened her speed until the tug and her tow were resting on the starboard side of the canal. The tug Coyne with her tow, it is stated, continued coming on toward the Cornell…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The OceanicaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  2. Sun Oil Co. v. Dalzell Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  3. Swenson v. Buffalo Barge Towing Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hall-Scott Motor Car Co. v. Universal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  2. Petterson Lighterage & Towing Corp. v. the J. Raymond RussellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  3. Phoenix Const. Associates v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1940
  4. The Melvin & MaryDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1938
  5. Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API