Legal Opinion

In re Parsons

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1996No. 96-BG-119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER

2Per curiam

On consideration of the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, recommending that the respondent be publicly censured for commingling a client’s funds in violation of Disciplinary Rule 9-103(A), the letter from Bar Counsel electing not to note an exception to the report and recommendation of the Board on Profession*1023al Responsibility, and it appearing that respondent elected not to note an exception to the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, it is

ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule XI, § 11(f)(1) of the Rules Governing…

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re OsborneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. In re GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API