Legal Opinion

Peoples Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cram

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1933No. 24308. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendants Cram and for a deficiency judgment against defendants Batinovich, who were grantees of the mortgaged property under mesne conveyances from the Crams. Judgment was entered foreclosing the mortgage, but not for any deficiency. Plaintiff appeals.

Appellant contends that the respondents Batinovich rendered themselves personally liable for the mortgage debt by reason of the fact that the deed, conveying the property to them, contained the following clause: “The grantee promises and agrees to have all existing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Elliott v. SackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Chaffee v. HawkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Proctor Trust Co. v. NeihartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Holcomb v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  5. Hopper v. CalhounSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Murr v. Selag Corp.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Perkins v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Cayne v. Washington Trust BankDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2015
  4. Murr v. Selag Corp.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API