Legal Opinion · Dissent

Coleman v. Ritchie

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 6, 2009No. A08-2169Published

1Dissent

ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice

(dissenting).

It’s not the voting that’s democracy, it’s the counting.

Tom Stoppard, Jumpers (1972) act I.

I respectfully dissent. I disagree with the majority’s decision to enjoin county canvassing boards from including any previously rejected absentee ballots in the administrative recount. I appreciate the majority’s efforts to see that the results of the election reflect “the true vote of the people.” We all share the goal that the results of this election be accurate. But the majority’s decision to bar county canvassing boards from performing their legal duties —…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Burson v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Transport Leasing Corporation v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API