Legal Opinion
Acosta-Rodriguez v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 21, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*504Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard H. Sherman, J.), entered on or about January 6, 2009, which granted defendants-respondents ’ motion for, inter alia, summary judgment dismissing the complaints as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs raised no triable issues of fact to contradict the evidence submitted by defendants that the sexual abuse of the infant plaintiffs by an employee of defendant Board of Education (BOE) was not committed in furtherance of school business and was done for personal reasons. Accordingly, defendants cannot be held liable under the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- N. X. v. Cabrini Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Doe v. WhitneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- White v. Hampton Management Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- T. W. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Gomez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doe v. New York City Department of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- S.C. v. New York City Department of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- S.C. v. New York City Department of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012